Pulls together academic, background, and writing-pattern context to support an officer's own review — it does not decide anything on its own.
What this tool is not: it does not detect AI-generated text, and no combination of sentence-length variation, vocabulary, or word choice reliably proves whether an essay was AI-assisted or human-written. Nothing here is a score, a risk level, or a verdict of any kind, and nothing here is grounds on its own for an admissions or disciplinary decision. Use it only to prepare informed, non-accusatory questions or a conversation with the applicant when something in the full file genuinely warrants one — and route any real integrity concern through your institution's official process.
1. Document Upload
📄
Upload Common App / Application File
Supports .pdf, .docx, or .txt — parsed entirely in your browser, never uploaded anywhere.
2. Academic Background
All test scores optional — shown as reference context only, never combined with the writing-pattern observations below.
3. Background Context Informational only — not scored
Check this only if the applicant disclosed that themselves — never infer it.
School-level public data — not anything tied to an individual student's records.
4. Application Essay
Not sent to, or used by, this tool's display — it's only here so you can note which application this was, on your own end. Never enter a student's name or email.
Context Worksheet
Discussion aid — not a determination
Academic Snapshot
Background Context
Before you continue:
Reading this student's academic and school-profile context first — not skipping to the writing patterns — is the single biggest thing you can do to avoid misreading an unfamiliar style as a red flag.
Writing Pattern Observations
These are neutral, descriptive facts about the text — not indicators of AI use or human authorship.
Possible Discussion Prompts
If you do have a reason for a follow-up conversation, these are starting points grounded in the essay's own content — not accusations.